COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Consider the 2012 experiments with multiple different experimental coronavirus vaccines for SARS C0V1 in animals. The vaccines did result in the animals producing antibodies to the coronavirus; but when they were challenged with the actual coronavirus, they developed much more severe disease, and had far higher mortality rates than would have otherwise occurred with the generally non-fatal coronavirus.
Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421

Let us examine how Antibody Dependent Enhancement, also called pathogenic priming and various other names, works. Neutralizing antibodies are antibodies that should bind to the infection, in this case the coronavirus by its SGP, and neutralize the virus so it cannot cause infection. The neutralizing antibody attached to the virus then also binds to immune cells that are supposed to ingest it, then destroy and dispose of it. However, the concern is that like all the coronavirus vaccines previously tested in animals, the antibodies are suboptimal and do not neutralize the virus; so instead the antibodies help get a viable virus into the immune system’s cells responsible for phagocytosis where it infects them. As more cells are infected, they produce more of the virus, which triggers more of these suboptimal antibodies, that get the viable viruses into more immune cells. It snowballs and gets worse after each injection and each infection.

This may be further complicated by the presence of spike glycoprotein on cells throughout the body which produced them in response to the mRNA in the “vaccine”. The concern here is that the antibodies produced either in response to the induced immune response, or triggered by a future coronavirus infection, will target one’s own cells throughout the body. This not only creates much risk for autoimmune disease, it also can contribute to profound and diffuse inflammation throughout the body, adding to the antibody dependent enhancement of the coronavirus infection. This will add much more inflammation throughout the victim’s body.

The profound level of inflammation throughout the body is sometimes described as a cytokine storm because of all the cytokine inflammatory chemicals present. Septic shock and death can result.
When faced with the actual coronavirus, the animals in the 2012 coronavirus vaccines experiments experienced much more severe disease and high death rates. Their autopsies revealed abnormalities including profound inflammatory changes in their lungs, with high presence of a type of immune cell called “eosinophils”.

Like the animals in all prior coronavirus vaccine attempts, the “vaccines” and the antibodies whose production that they trigger, may make future coronavirus infections much more severe than they would have been naturally, even fatal.
Doctors for Covid Ethics describe this within their article Experts Explain Why Vaccines Against Covid-19 are Unnecessary and Dangerous:
“Due to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years [35], this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.”
https://johnplatinumgoss.com/2021/05/01/experts-explain-why-vaccines-against-covid-19-are-unnecessary-and-dangerous/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

For more Doctors for Covid Ethics material: https://doctors4covidethics.org/blog/

Consider how perverse is this scenario: governments, big pharma, and media deceive people into receiving a dangerous experimental injection for an essentially non-fatal cold; and these people will now have severe and even fatal experiences with future colds. That is what happened to the lab animals; and is why coronavirus vaccines were abandoned.

Similar antibody-dependent enhancement of disease has been seen in experimentation with RSV vaccines in children with fatal results. https://beforeitsnews.com/agenda-21/2021/01/professor-dolores-cahill-why-people-will-start-dying-a-few-months-after-the-first-mrna-vaccination-2811.html
Please be cautioned that this will mean people who were injected, may later have severe and even fatal disease during the next cold season. It is especially concerning that this may be mislabeled as “covid-19” and drive even more people towards the so called “vaccines”, rather than drive them away as it should.
Other terms for antibody dependent enhancement, include: “AD Response, pathologic priming, immune priming, and immune super-priming.”
PROFESSOR DOLORES CAHILL: WHY PEOPLE WILL START DYING A FEW MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST MRNA VACCINATION https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dxjp6nkwhWn8/

Autopsies could distinguish Viral infection causing resp infection, vs immune response to a covid causing diffuse immune attack on subjects’ tissues throughout the body as they produce and bear the SGP.
This risk of antibody dependent enhancement is not being disclosed to the experimental injection subjects. This is yet another criminal violation of the Nuremberg Code involved in this global injection campaign. Here scientists conclude that subjects in the experiment should have been clearly told that the injection could make future coronavirus infections worse rather than better. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Here is an excerpt from their conclusions: “The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”